This case is about slaves or slavery.
Year: | 1820 |
Citation: | 5 H. & J. 51 |
Jurisdiction: | Maryland |
People: | Violet |
Short Summary: | Holding that inventory and a will was not competent evidence for manumission as well as hearsay evidence of the sale of a slave and the general reputation of a petitioner. |
Law type: | |
Full name: | Walkup vs. Pratt |
Court: | Court of Appeals of Maryland |