This case is about slaves or slavery.
| Year: | 1829 |
| Citation: | 1 G. & J. 434 |
| Jurisdiction: | Maryland |
| People: | |
| Short Summary: | The defendant arguing that payment in specific property and slaves could not support an action for recovery of money. The court holding that the distinction between property delivered and money paid does not have a foundation in law. Furthermore, that the inconcevenience of the distributees would not nullify the remedy. |
| Law type: | |
| Full name: | Turner, Adm'r of Wilder vs. Egerton |
| Court: | Court of Appeals of Maryland |