This case is about slaves or slavery.
Year: | 1811 |
Citation: | 3 H. & J. 249 |
Jurisdiction: | Maryland |
People: | Joseph |
Short Summary: | Witness testifying that the defendant did not want the slave before the statute of limitations expired. Holding that a witness testimony is still proper even if the witness has a deed of sale for the slave in question |
Law type: | |
Full name: | Quimby vs. Wroth |
Court: | Court of Appeals of Maryland |